Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
If a traveling violation took place before contact on the floor, it would not matter unless you deemed the player (that fell) to do something flagrant or intentional.
That being said it is possible that a player would be in legal guarding position at one time, but it does not sound like it based on how this play was described.
Either way it is a stretch in my opinion to call a foul on this play and common sense would be to call the violation.
Peace
|
Okay I see what you mean. Now that I look back, this might not have been a travel at all, because his feet were never on the floor, they landed on the defender... Whatever, I guess they didn't make as bad of a call as I thought. Thanks