Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinski
An earlier thread got me thinking about a very plausible scenario, but one that I don’t recall seeing or at least being called in my short carrier.
Scenario:
Three point attempt: A1 goes up, releases shot and lands. B1 then spins to box him out but is too aggressive and clearly fouls A1. The ball then goes in and the ref calls the foul and scores the bucket. However, at the time of the foul the shooter was back on the ground after the shot, so it’s not a shooting foul. Also, team A is in bonus, so he gets a one-and-one or two shots. We would have what would appear like a 5 point play. I believe this is all correct but would seem odd. I’m sure some coaches and many fans would perceive this as A1 getting two shots after getting fouled on a made 3 pointer.
Is this all correct? Comments?
|
You're correct that this is not a shooting foul and if applicable, A1 shoots the bonus - even if it does seem odd.
If you voice clearly while reporting the foul, the coaches should be understanding what the call is (though they may not agree), since they'll likely be listening to you report.
I've had this foul before and through experience, we can tell when a coach isn't clear on a certain rule. By choosing your words carefully (in the style of Ed Hochuli), you can diffuse some comments or questions that a coach may have.
As for the fans, meh. If they get it, then fine. If they don't, it gives them soemthing to talk about on the drive home.