View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jan 22, 2009, 09:16am
ma_ref ma_ref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbrown View Post
the rules interpreter said three. His reasoning which I know is wrong was that an intentional foul is a technical foul, so you shoot one for the foul and two for the technical.
That is scary. Your board might want to think about getting a new interpreter...
Reply With Quote