Quote:
Originally Posted by Amesman
No way, though a different player could try it (in second or third instances). Then, I'd say go right to the 2. personal, 3. intentional scenario described above. Or skip the personal if you've made it known clearly enough what's happened.
Of course, depending on the, uh, energy put into said foot-stepping-on, it could go unsporting immediately, not unlike an elbow. IMHO (Or now are we getting into flagrant personal/tech territory?)
Also, with a quick look I couldn't find the right violation-foul citation in the book. That is, wouldn't the violation bring a dead ball, thereby casting subsequent foul in a different, harsher light? I know I'm just not looking in the right place (re: fouls after a violation). Or since this is the continuation of the same play, does that matter?
Sorry, but I could bet when I see this team again, it's going to come up again in one form or another.
|
Defensive violations do not cause the ball to become dead when they are free throw lane violations. Therefore, you could call the violation and the personal foul (my preference here).
If he does this after the free throw motion has started, let the shot go up and call the delayed violation.
If the offense does it, kill it immediately with a violation. Next time, you could still do both if you don't see it until he's on the foot.
My point was you cannot call this a T; it's got to be personal (either common, intentional, or flagrant.)