Okay, here's another twist. A is shooting the foul shots. B1 and B2 are in the bottom lane spaces. A2 is in the next space up on one side, but no A player wants that next space on the other side, so B3 takes it. Now, who gets right of first refusal on the sapce next to B3? Can A legally demand it, since the rule uses the word "alternating"? If A took the space B3 is in, Bwould have first rights to the next space up. Do they get that anyway, since A gets first rights to that "middle" space? Am I making any sense?
|