View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jan 10, 2009, 11:31pm
SAump SAump is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,577
Fairness to comment above

Quote:
Originally Posted by tballump View Post
Yes they would (MLB would place 2 HD cameras in CF on either side of the pitcher and one directly over the plate and rely on computer video graphic packages that capture the location of the baseball in a series of instant replay videos), and I believe that was the MLUA arguement when announcers tried to call pitches from the camera years ago. It has also been the WUA's position ever since Questec was initiated, and I believe the WUA has quite successfully challenged many of the points you brought up about the deficiencies in the system.
Previous MLUA incorrect strike calls were once electronically tagged as a strike. The umpire was always right according to MLB.

Current WUA incorrect strike calls are removed from the database by Pitch/FX for MLB before release of data to the public. No one could prove the umpire wasn't right according to MLB. So how did that other website SDS provided know if the umpire call resulting in an ejection was correct or not?

Future negotiations may include reversal of incorrect call with crew consultation and permission from MLB Instant Replay office. The umpire will always be right thanks to high definition TV according to MLB.

Thanks for the interesting discussion and valuable comments provided by all.
Trying hard to be clear here with added union info provided by tballump.
__________________
SAump

Last edited by SAump; Sun Jan 11, 2009 at 01:01am.