Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
That's how I'd rule (but I'd also like to change the interp).
|
Bob, I couldn't agree more. This call, is related, but different from, my other post concerning the purpose of the division line and the hard-to-explain and harder-to-justify backcourt violation rules. In this case, the rule calls for a back court violation. I think that even those who feel that the purpose of all of these violations is to create more turnovers for the defensive team would have to concede that this one fails to meet that criteria (1 second into the game).
This situation is yet another that would be "fixed" (assuming that you agree that this is a bad rule) by a change in the division line rule.