Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
We are not talking about passing or not passing. We are talking about a rule that may or may not be more difficult to officiate for all levels and all circumstances. Do not take a statement in one context and start adding it to another situation.
The point is the term is not mutually exclusive, because if officials have a problem enforcing a rule, then the game is going to suffer. And since officials enforce rules of the game, we better be able to consistently understand and handle rules that we must deal with. They do not change rules language for just the benefit of the "game." They do this so the officials can understand the intent or apply the rules much more consistently.
Peace
|
I understood your intent, Jeff. You missed mine, apparently. I was just saying that it's not necessarily what's easiest for us that's best for the game.
I would say if the officials have a problem enforcing the rule, then the game may suffer, but
it's not necessarily because of the rule. It may be that
we as officials have to step it up and get 'er done and not say "It's just too hard for us. Make it easier."
That was my point. We had 100+ years of football before PSK, which, to my knowledge, makes things harder for us. But it's not going away, so it's incumbent upon us to figure it out.
It may very well be that a rule or a procedure is unworkable.
That is bad for the game. But it shouldn't necessarily be judged on how "difficult" it is for us as officials. Our jobs are, by their very nature, difficult.
How difficult you want them to get is a matter of degrees.
We do not make policy, gentlemen. We are the instruments of that policy.