Quote:
Originally Posted by OverAndBack
ART. 2 . . . A scrimmage-kick formation is a formation with at least one player 7 yards or more behind the neutral zone and in position to receive the long snap. No player may be in position to receive a hand-to-hand snap from between the snapper’s legs and it is obvious that a kick may be attempted.
Rationale: This would eliminate the use of the numbering exception rule on scrimmage downs unless it is obvious that a kick may be attempted (i.e. 4th & 10 not 1st & 10). Football has been and always will be a game of deception and trickery involving multiple shifts, unusual formation and creative plays.
|
That language solves nothing. When is it never obvious that a kick
may be attempted? A kick
may be attempted on 1st & 10. I've seen kicks on 1st down a few times, but even if it'd never been done, it
may be done.
If they wanted to, they could formulate definite criteria, like proposal 15, but they should not stick their head into this "may be" mess even if NCAA's been there already.
I see the long march of the hash marks inward across the codes is proposed to continue.
Do any of you think the proposal for the chop block revision woule make it
easier to administer? Looks to me that it might be harder, because there
must be
some (unstated) time limit on what constitutes a combination block.
Robert