Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
How don't understand what disparity you see. The rule and case play are clear to me
If you beckon the coach, the player must be removed or the coach must use a TO to keep him in the game.
If the coaches enters without being beckoned, he must replace him.
What are you seeing differently?
|
This line throws me...
"A1 may remain in the game if the coach does not
come on the court and A1 is ready to play immediately"
So if I beckon the coach and he doesn't come out, do we need a sub or TO? I'm not selling wolf tickets when I beckon the coach. I think the casebook is leaving open the possibility for an astute coach to ignore my beckon in the hopes the player recovers 'immediately'
Little bit contradictory