Quote:
Originally Posted by youngump
The case play does not say anything about preliminary signals. It talks about the case where both officials CALL different things. The part I'm missing here is why everyone is so convinced that if you make the initial signal that you're bound to the double foul. The case play is about how to deal with the situation when you don't agree or saw different things.
There is not in black and white what people are saying is black and white. That isn't the same as saying that the procedure doesn't exist as an unwritten rule. But this case play does not say what people are saying it does.
|
At what point do you suggest that two officials have "CALLED" different things? Only if both have reported to the table?
The call(s) is(are) made when a signal is given that indicates what the call is...even if it is the preliminary.
This is simply black and white no matter how much you would like it to be otherwise.