Sun Dec 14, 2008, 07:44pm
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Layton, Utah
Posts: 109
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
Ok, I get the point. I don't think anyone wants to call a blarge. However, many feel that, because of the case play involving a blarge, we are obligated to do so if two officials give conflicting preliminary signals on the play. I have maintained that this is an option, but the preliminary signals do not set the call in stone. This thread is an example of this. One official signals a personal. The other signals a technical. OOPS! Somebody made a mistake. Same as when the blarge was called. Unfortunate, sure. But we get together and figure out which is right, as best we can, and go forward.
|
Thanks, I do appreciate your comments, and I understand that philosophy from your posting...thanks, again....
__________________
I love to mate.....Chess, The Kings Game
|