|
Mark,
I haven't searched for it, but there was a thread about this new case play earlier. We also discussed it in length at some of my pre-season meetings here. I don't know that there was consensus, but several people agreed that this just has to be a mistake.
Once the ball has become live (B has the ball for the throw-in) then that qualifies as subsequent action after the correctable error, and therefore the throw-in should be the POI for resuming play. I've read through everything so many times I just can't come up with a way that A/P would be the correct way to resume.
The real question is whether there's a difference in whether the throw-in has ended or not (for purposes of how to resume play) and I see no rules evidence that there is.
So, a long, rambling answer to a long not-rambling question is: Nothing has changed, other than the case play.
|