Thu Dec 04, 2008, 04:16pm
|
 |
Keeper of the HAMMER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronald
I thought that is the screener was displaced it was a foul. Is that correct? Sounds like the screener was displaced in the OP.
|
There is an exception to this in rule 4-40-7.
Quote:
|
In cases of screens outside the visual field, the opponent may make inadvertent contact with the screener and if the opponent is running rapidly, the contact may be severe. Such a case is to be ruled as incidental contact provided the opponent stops or attempts to stop on contact and moves around the screen, and provided the screener is not displaced if he/she has the ball.
|
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
|