Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
I haven't seen the play, so I'm not going to say one way or the other.
That said, a "hard foul" is definitely what this rule refers to. It simply says that just because the player is going for the ball doesn't take away the possibility of an intentional foul.
"Intentional fouls may or may not be premeditated and are not based solely on the severity of the act."
This simply means contact does not have to be excessive to have an intentional foul; it does not mean a foul can't be ruled such based solely on its severity.
|
I didn't think the play in question was excessive contact.
I understand what you are saying. But, saying "a hard foul like this one" to me sounds like one is basing it off the severity of the act. Stating it's a "hard foul", in my opinion, doesn't mean it's intentional nor does it mean it's not.
I see the point Camron and you are making though.