Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
But to make it easier for our comrades in the Northwest, let's say it is FP.
|
Then I'm on board with the interference call.
However, do we really know that F2 held the throw due to the contact with the BR? IF the ball sails into LF, it's pretty darn obvious that the INT happened; i.e. F2 "sold it".
I will sometimes judge the lack of throw - did F2 intend to throw to 3B and held up due to the contact, or was it a pump-fake the whole time? One might draw an INT call from me, one might not. Judgement call.