View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 05:02pm
OHBBREF OHBBREF is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio, cincinnati
Posts: 813
disconcersion

NCAA case play on disconcertion
A.R. 187. The ball is at the disposal of free thrower A1. B1, within the
visual field of A1:
(1) Raises the arms above the head; or
(2) After the arms have been extended above the head, alternately
opens and closes both hands.
RULING: When the official judges the act in either (1) or (2) to be
disconcerting, the official shall assess a penalty. The burden not to
disconcert shall be that of the free thrower’s opponents.
(Rule 9-1.2.f and 9-2.2)
__________________
New and improved: if it's new it's not improved; if it's improved it's not new.
Reply With Quote