Quote:
Originally Posted by Spence
To summarize:
If the ball has not been touched/the throw in has not ended, its POI.
If the ball has been touched but no control established, its AP.
Correct?
|
Argh. Sorry for the frustration, but this is a fundamental piece that's being missed over and over:
Play after a double foul is
always resumed by employing POI. It's just that in this case, where the point of interruption is is determined by whether the throw-in has ended or not.
If the ball hasn't been touched, then the POI is the throw-in. Therefore, play was interrupted during a throw-in, and the team entitled to that throw-in is given another throw-in to resume play.
If teh ball has been touched, then the POI is a live ball in play with no team control. Therefore, play was interrupted during a live ball with no team control, and an A/P throw-in is awarded to the team that has the arrow.
Again, fundamentally, POI is
always used in this scenario. What an official must do in this case is determine what the point of interruption is...