Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSlav
Kyle:
If it's a question of ethics read the link I just posted titled "Umpire Ethics" and see what you think. I'm not holding out much hope though.
I ain't mad at anyone bro' I wasn't raised like that.  |
|
Hi Slav:
what you are finding out or most likely already knew is that umpires for the most part are divided into various "camps" regarding certain issues.
It's akin to a tag play on a runner in which Evans and Roder have different philosophies. Some umpires are in the Evans Camp and some are in the Roder Camp.
My main point which I believe you are trying to point out also is that the FYC or "sending a message"
IS a game management tool.
Whether you like it or not is moot because IMO I do not believe that if an umpire uses this technique then they should automatically be labeled as having no ethics or is "cheating' the game.
IMO, it's like many things in life "try it" and see.
I have done that with many things over my careeer from trying new stances behind the dish to experimenting with positions "B" / "C" when doing the bases etc.
Same is true for Game management tools. Try some and see if it works. Ie; The ole line-up card routine when a coach is giving you a hard time. Rather then get bent out of shape have that mono on mono chat with the coach and most of the times - problem solved.
There are many type examples in dealing with Game management which is the "nuts / bolts" of umpiring.
The point is: Most of us had to learn how to control a game.
How did we learn?
Watching other umpires, "picking the brains" of officials who have good management skills and Trying it out for oursleves
What's getting lost in all of this discussion is this.
The FYC is NOT used Everyday. It is used perhaps 1/2 times a year and when used can be effective.
Pete Booth