Mon Nov 10, 2008, 11:38am
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschramm
The bolded part above is pretty much the conclusion I've came to after thinking about it for a while. Not to get too off-topic, but is this a rule interpretation that could be protested by an opposing coach, for example if Coach A comes out, doesn't cross the line, doesn't confer with players and heads back to dugout? Coach B can argue that once I call time it should be a charged conference. I tell him that since Coach A didn't cross the line or confer with players, I will not charge him with a conference.
|
I would point out rule 2-10-1, which defines what a charged conference is. It is not a conference by definition without a conversation taking place.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
|