Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
I like the strike mat in SP.. lets stop pretending about the whole strike thing.. put a mat there..like everyone already does and plays with all year until they get to Nats.. and lets get it over with.
|
Really? That was marked for ALL games, including FP/MP!!! What do you say now?
Quote:
|
I prefer 10 after 4 in FP.
|
I believe the Run Rule change was meant to bring it into line with ISF.
Quote:
|
I would prefer it if they left the wording of the crash rule exactly as it is.
|
So, you have no problem with a runner scoring by wiping out a catcher without the ball?
Quote:
|
I like moving towards charging pitchers a ball on certain violations instead of IP. You'll get better enforcement if it is not such a deadly harsh penalty IMO.
|
Without a doubt.
Quote:
|
I do like keeping runners on the bases (or vicinity) for catcher conferences proposal.
|
Have you run into a problem with this?
Quote:
No need to mess with the catchers box.
|
Obviously, it doesn't affect FP, so why would you care? If you saw the 18U Gold, you would have noticed an abbreviated catcher's box.
Quote:
|
Metal Cleats, bring em. At 16's+ I say allow them. Like I predicted last year, it was a nightmare running into them all summer long. I even have run into them in fall ball "I thought ASA changed that."
|
Well, the first problem here is that some tried to "think". I didn't think that was allowed in CA?
Just kidding!
Quote:
|
Forget the coaches dress rule.. because it will be just my luck that I run into a partner that enforces it.
|
I would think this would be more of a problem with the opposing coach trying to find any type of ridiculous edge demand an ejection fo a coach not in what s/he thinks is proper. But, that wouldn't be my problem as I would immediately direct that coach to the TD
