Quote:
Originally Posted by rwest
In the OP and the case play, LGP applies.
|
This is one place we (somewhat) disagree. In the case play, LGP definitely applies because that's what the case play is all about. In the OP, LGP only applies if the defender is moving. If the defender is stationary, then a lot of things apply but LGP isn't one of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwest
A player who is on the playing court with his back to A1, is not defending A1. They are entitled to their spot on the floor and can not be displaced.
|
This we agree on 100%.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwest
These facts don't apply to the OP.
|
This we disagree on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwest
The player was defending A1 and as such has to be in LGP.
|
This is simply a false statement.
Other factors we've been talking about (like displacement for example)
always apply. LGP simply gives a defender
additional rights to move and maintain a position that forces the offensive player to be responsible for contact. But there is no requirement that for a PC foul to be called that a defender facing an opponent has to have LGP.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwest
You can't give the defense the right to stand out of bounds and allow them to play defense.
|
This is debatable. You can't allow a defender to intentionally leave the playing for to gain an advantage. That's a violation. Also, by definition, a player cannot obtain or maintain LGP while OOB. But I have yet to see anything that says a player can't defend while standing on a line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwest
A stationary player with LGP is protected but a stationary player can still be called for a foul.
|
Of course a player with LGP can commit a foul. All rules of illegal contact still apply to a player with LGP - LGP just helps define who is responsible for contact.