View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 30, 2008, 09:05am
LDUB LDUB is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
I get it. You said something so it must be true. Thanks for the heads up.
I say this is different than scrimmage kick situations then you say we might as well start ejecting for scrimmage kick fouls as well. I already said that they were completely different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Just because you raise a question, does not make it valid.
Considering the definition of a flagrant foul is "a foul..." it made perfect sense to ask if the contact was a foul. It is hard to say my question for what constitutes a flagrant foul is not valid when I am quoting the definition of a flagrant foul.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
And I am sorry but the violence of the hit alone does not change my mind. There are a lot of late or cheap hits that I never eject players for. This is no exception.
You missed the point. I said the violence wasn't important. How many of those hits involved intent to injure?
Reply With Quote