|
I fully realize that, and my "stance" that you refer to is based on a sarcastic reference I made that my experience was a scientific finding. It was in the spirit of "I got your scientific study right here..." As a result, I am getting treated like I am representing a scientific study when I am making a point that everyone is free to use or believe whatever they want, but that in the rare case that a bat breaks or gets flung or swung near your ear, a HSM is safer, and that on a straight shot to the grill, a Wilson Shock FX softens the blow the best ...
from what I have been able to tell
in my very limited experience of four decades catching and umpiring.
Last edited by Kevin Finnerty; Sun Oct 26, 2008 at 01:22pm.
|