|
The great thing about this whole debate, or any such Mask/HSM debate, is that it is not based on scientific facts, practical reality or anything logical. It is based on the biased belief of many that a mask, which they prefer, is as safe or effective as a helmet. A study is cited, and a trend is cited, but their conclusions are curious at best. I took a really good shot in a Wilson Shock FX, and it was the least impact I have ever felt from a shot of that type.
I prefer a mask. I probably always will. I keep getting a better and better mask with better and better pads, but unless I get an injury, I won't be switching to an HSM. I have caught games and bullpens with an All-Star HSM, and I have done informal demos with the new Wilson, but I have never worked a game in anything but a mask. But I would never hang on to the contention that a mask is safer than an HSM, just because I need validation for insisting on wearing a mask. There are added risks when wearing a mask, but I don't ever turn my head, and I've only been grazed by a bat once, so the added bulk of a helmet for something that virtually never happens is not for me. But a HSM is safer and the Wilson is the safest I have tried and gives the best view.
|