View Single Post
  #79 (permalink)  
Old Sat Oct 25, 2008, 11:06pm
LDUB LDUB is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
So you agree that 9-5-1d makes slapping at the snap a USC?

All plays must begin with a legal snap and for B to hinder that by ACTS or words is USC!
No, 9-5-1d is about disconcerting. It is illegal for B to disconcert A. Hindering is not illegal.

This shouldn't be too big of a discussion. In NCAA it is illegal. In Federation there is a good chance B encroached but if not it is legal.
Reply With Quote