Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim C
Take this post with a large grain of salt.
There was NO significant difference based on the type of equipment worn in either number or severity....
It is doubtful that the number of incidents was of a high enough number that it gives true empirical representations to make any final decisions...
|
Also known as a "small sample size." In general, the longer PBUC collects data, the more accurate their conclusions will be.
This is the same reason you ignore broadcasters when they say, "Joe Schmoe hits .750 with 3 RBI against Clyde Closer." He likely has far too few ABs to draw a meaningful conclusion.
I will follow Tim's advice.