Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
8.6.1 deals with an official's mistake.
2.10.1b deals with a correctable error of not awarding a merited FT.
The original post is not a correctable error because a unmerited FT was not awarded, as the second FT was never shot. The officlal gave the wrong info to both teams. To allow A2 to keep the ball because he rebounded it would unfair to B. Further, allowing A to keep the basket, which is what NVRef suggested, would be even more unfair.
Nothing in 2-10 or 2.10 has anything to do with this play. It's a completely different sitch from a rule standpoint.
|
I never said that it was fair, Tony. I just said that
BY RULE the player has scored a legal goal, and that there is no rules support for cancelling that.
This is similar to the discussion that we had last year about the FT shooter losing the ball and then stepping into the lane to chase after it
BEFORE an official sounded a whistle. Even you said that was a violation on the shooter
BY RULE. Here is a link to that thread:
Free Throw Violation
Of course, that debate is now moot due to the new part b of 9.1.1.
PS Please note that I did not suggest that Team A be allowed to keep the basket.
