Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr
The 2006-07 interpretation is WRONG!! please note that the Rules Committee references a rule that does not exist: R7-S5-A9; .
|
Mark:
I answered this earlier (see Post #38) You are wrong -- and you insist on repeating this as though if you say it enough it will be true. The rule cited existed when the case play was written. It has since been moved to 4-36-1 and 4-36-2a (definition of point of interruption).