View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 21, 2008, 01:40am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
The rule says "handles a ball to prevent". If it said "and prevents", the DOGSO would be negated by the goal.
I believe that you are overthinking this one and attempting to give a meaning to the words which they do not convey. The intent of the player is not the issue, other than determining that the handling was in fact deliberate. The success of that intent is what matters.

If a field player purposely handles the ball in an attempt to prevent it from entering the goal, but the ball makes it in despite this action without any other play by an attacker, then a red card is not warranted under NFHS rules.
Reply With Quote