Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
This interference situation, along with those that are close to it but something slightly different is judged by the umpire, is much discussed here and on the field when it occurs.
Assume R1 on 2B and an infield grounder where F6 would be the fielder who would be protected.
Let's assume the baserunner has done nothing to indicate anything other than running the bases full speed.
Let's assume the fielder has started to move to field the ball, but stops or slows or changes path and then proceeds after the runner has passed.
Let's assume that if SOMEBODY hadn't stopped / slowed / changed path, there would have been a collision
How do you judge interference here vs. dumb move fielder?
|
Tom - I hate to say it, but key word here is "judgement".
I understand that this is a cop-out, but I have to see the play to judge.
I will say that if the ball is hit in the vicinity of a baserunner, the onus is on the baserunner to be aware that a fielder may be in the area and avoid interfering with that fielder.