View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 02, 2008, 01:10pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by dumbref
The thing that really makes this tricky is B stopping - implying a cutoff. I think there is an argument for a double foul. Even the cutoff does not eliminate A’s restriction to block or push.

This one I'd really have to see.
This is where your judgment comes in. You cannot cut off a receiver running a route. You can engage a blocker or potential blocker as a defender. I do not think you could have a double foul if you feel you have a receiver being hit by the defender. From my point of view it would have to be one or the other at least using the example in the OP.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote