Thread: motion
View Single Post
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 28, 2008, 11:08am
Robert Goodman Robert Goodman is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L
I would think the question would not be whether the "back" in motion along the line is eligible, but whether the TE he is now "covering" is ineligible.
No way he could continue in motion and be "on the end of the line", because he's not in position on the line. So the TE's still the E.
Reply With Quote