And, perhaps, instead of "many" of the interpretations you should have said "a few".
There are hundreds of interpretations in the Jaksa/Roder manual. Only a tiny fraction of those were ever different from the OBR or Evans rulings. Some of those have been edited in recent editions so that they are now all in agreement.
How many of the interpretations are different today? A couple? A few?
Certainly not "many".
|