Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I have every right to bring up other plays when people use logic that is beyond what actually happen on this play. And if this screen was legal, then I wonder if you would not call a foul just because someone got hurt. Remember, I never suggested anything in this entire thread about if a player was hurt, but in response to the commentator (who is one of the worst) or comments from you and Tio about.
If you are worried about a game that gets out of hand on something that is not called, then you can compare any other no-call. If you do not like that comparison, then you should not be worried about what the crowd, coaches and players think. I have seen games get much more intense over plays that were actually called then plays that were not. I am trying to figure out what your standard is of making calls when you are so worried about what people think then whether the rules were actually violated. And the play in question was not so obvious without a shadow of a doubt. The only way I could clearly see this play was by the replay, not the live action.
Peace
|
Once again changing the scenario. Well I wonder if you would call "this, if this happened" and "if this coach did this" you would do this.
Jrut... I'm talking about this play and no other. I don't give a crap what a coach thinks, but at the level I'm at and the level I'm striving to be at I had better be able to explain what I called. If not to the coach then to the assignor or commisioner of the conference. I wouldn't want to explain a no call or intentional in
this situation.