View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 09, 2002, 11:39am
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by David Emerling


In OBR, if the improper batter hits into a double play, you would want to remain SILENT regarding the fact that he batted out of order. Because the play would be nullified and only the proper batter would be declared out. Basically, in OBR, there is hardly ever any advantage to claim that a batter who made an out batted out of order.

In my opinion, the ASA interpretation is a bit extreme. Probably the FED is the best middle ground. Yet, all three are different, as you've pointed out.
Hell, Dave, you think half the things ASA does is to the extreme, but being a baseball-influenced person, I can understand.

However, what is so extreme about the rule? Why should the defense be penalized for making a good play and catching the offense in an illegal act?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote