View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 07, 2008, 10:43am
Skahtboi Skahtboi is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by snorman75
I agree with everything you said, I call it that way, but is it right?

I am sorry but I disagree, and there is the rule and I have 10 questions form the 2007 NYS high School softball exam, that tell me I better not take intent into account when calling interference.
"Intent" and "actively hindering" are two completely different things, which is what all of these posters are trying to get you to understand. Perhaps if you came off of the defensive, and actually reread what has been posted in response, you will start to understand the "intent" of ASA's removal of the word "intent" from the rule. Several people have clearly explained this.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote