Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
Listen, snorman, you brought up intent as justification for your not knowing the rule. I merely pointed out that you apparently did not understand the rule even before the intent issue, since the rule under discussion never, ever, included intent.
But, since you apparently don't understand interference in general, I guess it is no surprise you are confused.
|
I truly have no idea what your train of thought is?
I know there is no intent in the running lane rule. I never said there was. You see I used a change ASA made in another rule, intent on interference on a thrown ball, as a example of rules becoming more black and white.
Now I am sure you are trying to bate me, but I really am perplexed why?