View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 06, 2008, 11:29pm
snorman75 snorman75 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Uh, no, the runner is not out unless the runner did something that could be an act of INT. Simply being hit with a thrown ball is absolutely nothing.
Pre 2007 yes, post 2007 nope. No act is needed. Will I call it like that NO. But look, it no longer says anything about the intent of the base runner on being hit with a thrown ball. It is now, wait for it bringing it all back together, black and white.

I do ask, do not just way no it is not, please show me anything or another way you could read 8.7.J.3. I know our board tried, with little luck. I feel it is a rule written one way and called another.

Last edited by snorman75; Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 11:43pm.
Reply With Quote