Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mu4scott
Breaking it down screen by screen you can clearly see the defender moving into the path of the airborne shooter while he is in the air. Also I don't see why his two feet being on the ground would be definitive of it being one way or the other. What if he had two feet planted and was leaning w/ his body into the shooter?
|
For now, I'll take your word for it. My point stands, however. Here are the options I see:
1. Blocking foul.
2. no-call.
Since a frame-by-frame analysis is required to determine which way to go, the "wrong" call is acceptable, IMO.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mu4scott
As far as the "incidental contact" part goes that can be debated. I'm sure most contact on the court is incidental, but it's still a foul.
|
Some might consider this statement absurd.
It cannot be incidental
and a foul. It's one or the other.