Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Would you say the same (that a no-call is "acceptable") if the contact was straight on, significant, with no hint of a flop and multiple bodies flying but was so close that it took a frame-by-frame to be sure about who was responsible? I just can't subscribe to no-calling something because it is hard to tell who is responsible if it is clear that some foul should be called (defender was there or they weren't). I'm going to go with my instinct and call something. It may be wrong, but I think its worse for the game to do nothing.
|
This is the part I agreed with you about. In this case, it's a must-whistle play, even if no one gets hurt. And sell the he!! out of it, whichever call you make.