[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by wadeintothem

I dont think there is any doubt that NCAA has surpassed ASA in mechanics and their system.

That depends on how you view each assn. mechanics

The reason for it is simple, ASA designs their mechanic to a lower common denominator of umpire and does little to adjust/allow for adjustment as the umpire advances. They are too rigid in their expectations, to the point of not allowing growth or superior position on a case by case basis.

I agree with the first part and it is an obvious reason. However, I disagree with the part. I have been around a while working some high-level nationals and I can tell you as a fact, the umpires who work their way up have made adjustments and are anything, but robotic. Each have an on-field character of their own and they all still learn.

NCAA 3 man is superior, especially their considerations of inside/out theory vs rim.

I've worked both and I'll take the I/O though there are limited instances (in the 3+ umpire systems only) where an umpire on the corner stays outside. I had quite a long discussion with HP in Plant City concerning such situations.

NCAA plate positioning is superior.

IMO, that's laughable as there are obvious drawbacks that you just refuse to see.

NCAA focus on being smarter and reading the play is superior.

ASA doesn't focus on an umpire using their brain and read a play? I feel sorry for those who go through your training as it sounds you are definitely receiving inferior training compared to what we stress.

4th dimension is valid when it is given real consideration as a technique on tag plays.

Yeah, another catch phrase that has no meaning. No matter what an umpire does, he is still only going to get a 3-D look at best. And getting such an angle is nothing more than an umpire moving into what s/he believes is the most advantageous look available. Something that all umpiring bodies have been preaching for years.

Umpire-umpire communication is far superior... especially this year with ASA National Staff disallowing nonbook umpire communication.

If you say so. Other than the IFF, I don't believe there is that much need for special "signals".

NCAA is MUCH LESS robotic than in years past IMO. ASA allows no individuality with one single exception - called 3K.

Again, I disagree with your view of ASA. Then again, how many different ways can you execute the signal for a routine out or safe call? And what is wrong with having a uniform method of providing signals to communicate the results of an event for those not within earshot?