Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
The posters that have trouble with this ruling are missing the point that I thought was so obvious that it is not a violation for a player from Team A, which has control of the ball in its frontcourt, to cause the ball to go from Team A's frontcourt to a Team A's backcourt. The violation is being the first player to touch or be touched by the ball after the ball has regained backcourt status. A2's touching causes two things to happen simulanteously: 1) Causing the ball to return to the backcourt, and 2) being the first player to touch it after the ball returned to the backcourt. It is a pretty simple concept.
MTD, Sr.
|
Correct you are on this statement. However (in the Sit 10 from the NFHS), who was the last to touch the ball
before the ball returned to the backcourt? B. There fore, there is no violation.