Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jdw3018
So, Sit 10 definitely applies to Nevada's scenario because the entire point of Sit 10 is to try to argue that the catching of a ball with front court status while standing in back court is tantamount to being both the last to touch it in the front court and the first to touch it in the back court.
|
It took me writing a response, reviewing it, posting it, re-reviewing it, and editing it; but the lightbulb went off.