Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Nevada, how does your scenario fit the rule? No one from A touched the ball in the front court, ever. Situation 10 (I'll agree that it's a disaster) doesn't affect your scenario.
|
Someone from A touching the ball in the front court is not a critical part of Situation 10. The only critical parts are:
Team Control A
Ball has front court status
Deflected by B
Caught by A in the back court before the ball has bounced in the back court.
So, Sit 10 definitely applies to Nevada's scenario because the entire point of Sit 10 is to try to argue that the catching of a ball with front court status while standing in back court is tantamount to being
both the last to touch it in the front court and the first to touch it in the back court.