Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
One has to be able to put two and two together and get four. The NFHS can't write out a play ruling for every possible situation with every exact detail. If they attempted to do it that way the case book would be larger than the encyclopedia.
If one takes the similar interps and play rulings of the NFHS and puts them together, one can easily deduce how the NFHS wants the situation to be handled. That's not called personal interpretation. That's called reason and logic.
|
Naw, that's called a load of boolsh!t.
As JAR said, the play isn't definitively covered under the rules. That doesn't stop
ONE from proclaiming to the masses that
HIS way is the only true way.
You may end up being right if we ever do get an definitive answer from the FED on this. But no matter how many times before then you proclaim that it's
ONE's "reason and logic" and therefore it must be right, that still doesn't make it fact at the present moment.