Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
The interp you cite does not match this situation. As far as I know up to this point, there is no specific NFHS ruling for this situation. All that leaves is personal interpretation.
|
One has to be able to put two and two together and get four. The NFHS can't write out a play ruling for every possible situation with every exact detail. If they attempted to do it that way the case book would be larger than the encyclopedia.
If one takes the similar interps and play rulings of the NFHS and puts them together, one can easily deduce how the NFHS wants the situation to be handled. That's not called personal interpretation. That's called reason and logic.