Jurassic,
I really don't care about anything else in this thread at this point, except for your comment about going around a screen during the throw-in. I don't care about the player setting the screen (at least until we can agree on the player going around the screen). Just to refresh your memory, here's our previous exchange:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scrapper
1) What!?!?! So you're saying it would be a violation for A2 to run out of bounds during a throw-in to go around a screen set by A3? He's not part of the throw-in in that situation, so by your rationale, it should be a violation.
|
Um, yup, I sureasheck am saying that. |
So in this thread, you have said unequivocally that it is a violation for a player on the throw-in team to run out of bounds on the endline to go around a screen during a non-designated spot throw-in.
But in '05, when the penalty for leaving the court for an unauthorized reason was changed to a violation, you unequivocally stated that it was
NOT a violation for a player on the throw-in team to run out of bounds on the endline to go around a screen during a non-designated spot throw-in. The rationale you gave for that position was that "there are no unauthorized reasons for being out of bounds on the endline during a non-designated spot throw-in".
So which position is correct? The player running around the screen has committed a violation? Or the player has not committed a violation?