View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 25, 2008, 09:29am
rookieblue rookieblue is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 82
Hi, Josh,

Don't know if you were thinking of Jaksa/Roder, but it says:
Quote:
The granting of protection to a fielder may be withheld momentarily on slowly developing plays:

(b) If a ball is rolling along a foul line, and a fielder is moving along with it, but opting not to reach for the ball (waiting to see if the ball will roll foul), the fielder is not protected.
(2004 ed. at 98, italics in original)

I agree, it's hard to tell from the original post if F3 was attempting to field the ball at the time of contact, or was essentially heeding F2's call to let it roll foul. Might be interference, might be nuttin'. This statement would seem to indicate the former.
Quote:
the fielder, after contact, waited for the ball to stop before picking it up.
I'm leaning towards interference, since it reads like F3 was still crouched to field an approaching batted ball, and only decided (was forced?) to let it roll to a stop after contact.

Cheers,

Bob James
__________________
"...a humble and contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise." - Ps li

"The prompt and correct judgements of the honorable umpire elicited applause from the members of both clubs, and their thanks are tendered to him for the gentlemanly manner in which he acquitted himself of that onerous duty." - Niagara Indexensis, May 20th 1872
Reply With Quote