View Single Post
  #60 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 12:22am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Check out rule 4. Don't have my books with me to quote them but it defines several types of fouls...with the same type of language. This one is no different. They're just attempting to get everyone to recognize that this is sufficient to qualify as a foul because it was not clear for some people or was being passed on too often. It doesn't mean it has to be called any more than any other type of textbook foul. Common sense, advantage/disadvantage, and intelligent use of the rules is still necessary.
Have you been possessed by Rut?
Reply With Quote